Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 Ga. App. 822 - Couch v. State

256 Ga. App. 822 - Couch v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 224 Ga. App. 332 - Edwards v. State · 148 Ga. App. 55 - Williams v. State · 249 Ga. App. 39 - Smith v. State · 217 Ga. App. 18 - Kennedy v. State · 232 Ga. App. 541 - Clay v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion for continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and this court will not interfere unless it is clearly shown that the court abused its discretion. ... [T]he trial judge, in the exercise of his discretion to grant or refuse a continuance, has to consider the facts and circumstances of each case to determine what the ends of justice require. Broad discretion must be granted trial courts on matters of continuances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.