Lipner v. Lipner’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

25 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““. . . However, the appellant failed to make any offer to prove which is required when an objection is sustained to a question asked on direct examination. See T.R. Rule 43(C). This requirement was also in effect prior to the present rule. See Isenhour v. Speece (1958), 238 Ind. 293 , 150 N.E. 2d 749 ; Kavanagh v. Butorac (1966), 140 Ind. App. 139 , 9 Ind. Dec. 538 , 221 N.E.2d 824 .””

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 159 Ind. App. 98 - Freeman v. Freeman · 156 Ind. App. 192 - Booher v. Alhom, Inc.

2. “"Guardianship, custody, support and education of children. — The court in decreeing a divorce shall make provision for the guardianship, custody, support, and education of the minor children of such marriage; and the court may require the father to provide all or some specified part of the cost of education of such child or children beyond the twelfth year of education provided by the public schools, taking into consideration the earnings of the father, the station in life of the parents and child or children involved, the aptitude of the child or children as evidenced by school records, the separate property of the child or children, and all other relevant factors: Provided, That the jurisdiction over the child or children shall remain in the court at all times during the child's or children's minority and shall not be lost because of the death of either parent." IC 1971, XX-X-XX-XX (Burns Code Ed.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 161 Ind. App. 275 - DeLong v. DeLong