Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 Ind. 467 - Hollowell v. State

Hollowell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 1993
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 1993

16 state decisions

80197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffith v. State · Cummings v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Therefore, even though the court permits a witness to testify during rebuttal regarding a matter which, in fact, is not in rebuttal but is a matter related to the state’s case in chief, the irregularity will not be treated as reversible error unless under the circumstances the appellant was prevented from presenting rebuttal evidence thereto.” 239 Ind. at 323 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The order of procedure is prescribed by statute. (I.C. 1971, 35-1-35-1, being Bums § 9-1805) While orderly procedure provides that a party not divide his evidence and give part in chief and part in rebuttal, this Court has recognized that the trial court is inherently responsible for the conduct and progress of the trial, and as such upon review we must liberally construe the statutes prescribing the order of trial in favor of the trial judge who has permitted a witness to testify out of the prescribed order. Griffith v. State (1959), 239 Ind. 321 , 157 N. E. 2d 191 .” 269 N. E. 2d at 758 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.