Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 KAN 571 - State v. Alston

State v. Alston’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2023

20 state decisions

801994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Carnegie v. United States · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart · Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “adverse pretrial publicity may endanger the ability of a defendant to receive a fair trial in situations where prospective jurors read or hear the adverse publicity and are affected in their judgment should they later sit as jurors.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.