256 Mich. App. 165 - People v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reflects that no particular period is referred to in the statute. Had the Legislature intended the meaning defendant assumes, the statute would refer to”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Francisco“[A]ll crimes within a 5-year period, including the sentencing offense, shall be counted regardless of whether the offense resulted in a conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Francisco“a 5-year period, including the sentencing offense ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Francisco
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.