Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 Mich. App. 4 - Busch v. Holmes

256 Mich. App. 4 - Busch v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 1319 · 33 U.S.C. § 1321 · 33 U.S.C. § 2702 · 33 U.S.C. § 2705

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “look to the plain language of the insurance policy in determining the scope of coverage....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. K.V.G. Props., Inc. v. Westfield Ins. Co.
  2. “[c]lear and specific exclusions must be given effect,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. K.V.G. Props., Inc. v. Westfield Ins. Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.