256 Mich. App. 531 - Atchison v. Atchison’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(a) A court of this state determines that neither the child, nor the child and 1 parent, nor the child and a person acting as a parent have a significant connection with this state and that substantial evidence is no longer available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships. (b) A court of this state or a court of another state determines that neither the child, nor a parent of the child, nor a person acting as the child's parent presently resides in this state. [ 7 ]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 326 Mich. App. 73 - Subrhamanyam Raju Nadimpali v. Padma Byrraju

2. “[t]he court of the other state determines it no longer has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction under [ MCL 722.1202 ]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 326 Mich. App. 73 - Subrhamanyam Raju Nadimpali v. Padma Byrraju

3. “clarify the exclusive continuing jurisdiction for the state that entered the child-custody decree....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 326 Mich. App. 73 - Subrhamanyam Raju Nadimpali v. Padma Byrraju