Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 N.C. 213 - McCraw v. Llewellyn

McCraw v. Llewellyn’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably Johnson v. Sanders (1963), Croom v. . Lumber Co. (1921)

3 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

140196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holsz v. Stephen · Kirby v. Stokes County Board of Education · Jamerson v. . Logan · Croom v. . Lumber Co. · Yeager v. Dobbins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The writing must show the promise or obligation which the complaining party seeks to enforce. (Citations omitted.) “An aggrieved party may recover for the breach of a contract, made upon sufficient consideration, that the promisor will make him the beneficiary of a bequest or devise in his will, but such a contract must be established by the mode of proof legally permissibe in estabishing other contracts.” (Citation omitted.) “The Agreement Must Adequately' Express The Intent And Obligation of the Parties. Parol evidence cannot be received to supply anything which is wanting in the writing to make it the agreement on which the parties rely.” (Emphasis added.) (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.