State v. Burell’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2020
6 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on James v. Dravo Contracting Co. · Bowen v. Johnston · Kohl v. United States · Haggar Co. v. Helvering · Silas Mason Co. v. Tax Commission of Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If, however, exclusive jurisdiction, although offered, was not accepted by the United States, there is no warrant for the conclusion that the State did not retain its territorial jurisdiction over the area in question so far as its exercise involved no interference with the carrying out of the federal project.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson“in such other manner as may be prescribed by the laws of the State where such lands are situated”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.