Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 N.C. 716 - Johnson v. Bass

Johnson v. Bass’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Primm v. King · Hudson v. PETROLEUM TRANSIT COMPANY · Hill v. . Lopez · Nichols v. . Goldston · Johnson v. Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. .the operator of an automobile, traveling upon a designated main traveled or through highway and approaching an intersecting highway, is under no duty to anticipate that the operator of an automobile approaching on such intersecting highway will fail to stop as required by the statute, and, in the absence of anything which gives or should give notice to the contrary, he will be entitled to assume and to act upon the assumption, even to the last moment, that the operator of the automobile on the intersecting highway will act in obedience to the statute, and stop before entering such designated highway.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.