Marr v. Tumulty’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably The First National Bank of Cincinnati v. Sidney Pepper, Elsie W. Cox, Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellants, Modern Talking Picture Service, Inc. (1972), Woodling v. Garrett Corp. (1987)
13 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mammoth Oil Co. v. United States · Vail v. . Reynolds · American Surety Co. v. Conner · Holden v. . New York and Erie Bank · Thomas v. Beals
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in equity to procure the declaration of a rescission on whatever terms may be just”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.