Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

256 So. 2d 64

Slate v. Brown

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 14, 1971

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1971-12-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1972

Relies on Lane v. Cohen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1971-12-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The plaintiffs in the trial court appeal a summary final judgment for the defendants upon a complaint alleging fraud in the sale of stock in a corporation to be formed. The judgment is supported by the depositions of the plaintiffs where it appears that the corporation was formed and one of the appellants participated as an officer until losses were encountered. The testimony of the plaintiffs fails to support the allegations of their complaint. In *65addition, it affirmatively appears that there is no further evidence of the alleged fraud available for trial. See Lane v. Cohen, Fla. App.1967, 201 So.2d 804 for the rule that a summary judgment will' be affirmed where the depositions demonstrate that the appellant is completely without proofs to sustain his complaint.

¶2Affirmed.

/256/so2d/64 · .json · Public domain