Dahn v. Dahn’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Carter v. Carter · Wakili v. Wakili · State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Worthy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Husband does not contend that the parties were not in agreement at the time the record was made before the trial court. He does not contend that the agreement failed to dispose of all of the material assets and debts. In fact, the record would not support such claims. Husband testified that the agreement was complete and that he knew he could not come back later and change the agreement. He said he had all the information he needed to reach the agreement and asked the court to find it fair and not unconscionable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dahn v. Dahn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.