Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 256 SW3D 398 - Alcocer v. State

Alcocer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 186th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Saldano v. State · Garza v. State · Pickens v. State · Turner v. State · McRae v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When essential facts concerning the search or arrest are not in dispute, the legality of the search or arrest is a question of law, not fact, and no jury instruction is required.”); 'White v. State, 201 S.W.3d 233, 248-49 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2006, pet. ref’d) (holding that, where there was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.