Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 Ala. 141 - Glass v. Cook

Glass v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
4
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Johnson (1975), Nelson Realty Co. v. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc. (1957)

39 state decisions

1301952196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Van Antwerp v. Van Antwerp · Ruffin v. Crowell · McGowin v. McGowin · Tollett v. Montgomery Real Estate Ins. Co. · Eatman v. Nuckols

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * It is a fundamental principle long recognized by this court that one who has been defrauded may either rescind the transaction or may affirm and sue at law for deceit. He may not do both. Tollett’s case, supra; 17 C.J.S., Contracts, § 167, p. 523. Of course, in equity he will be made whole, but that relief must be consistent with the principle of rescission. [Citation omitted.]” 257 Ala. 141, 144 , 57 So.2d 505 , 507.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.