Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 Ala. 168 - Ray v. Garner

Ray v. Garner’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2008

7 state decisions

40195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Allwright · Nixon v. Condon · Smith v. McQueen · Chapman v. King · State ex rel. Adair v. Drexel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"All persons who are qualified electors under the general laws of the State of Alabama and who are also members of a political party and entitled to participate in such primary election under the rules of said party shall be entitled to vote therein and shall receive the official primary ballot of that political party, and no other; but every governing body of a party shall have the right, power and authority to fix and prescribe the political *Page 346 or other qualifications of its own members and shall, in its own way, declare and determine who shall be entitled and qualified to vote in such primary election or to be candidates therein or to otherwise participate in such political parties and primaries. The qualifications of electors entitled to vote in such primary election shall not necessarily be the same as the qualifications for electors entitled to become candidates therein. Nothing herein contained shall be so construed as to prohibit any state executive committee of a party from fixing such qualifications as it may deem necessary for persons desiring to become candidates for nomination to offices at a primary election. "”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`run afoul of some statutory or constitutional provision'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.