The Howell’s Empirical Analysis
257 F. 578 · 1919
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1939
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen · New York Central Railroad Company v. Sarah White · Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co. · James Clark Distilling Company v. Western Maryland Railway Company · Clyde Steamship Company v. William Alfred Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and to claimants the rights and remedies -under the workmen’s compensation law of any State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“rights and remedies under the workmen’s compensation law of any State”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.