Woods v. Klobuchar’s Empirical Analysis
257 F.2d 313 · 1958
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 1982
7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc. · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · Angel v. Bullington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The plaintiff states that the sole contested issue on this appeal is as follows: “ ‘Was the Plaintiff-Appellant’s action in the Federal Court under Section 1332, United States Code, Title 28, governed by the six (6) month time limit for filing claims in the ■court administering the decedent’s ■estate?’ “Our answer must be in the affirmative.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Slater v. Stoffel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.