United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
257 F.2d 41 · 1958
Citation profile
63 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably 52 Ill. 2d 374 - People v. Clark (1972), 56 Ill. 2d 361 - People v. Pierce (1974)
63 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Graves v. United States · United States v. Rosenberg · McClanahan v. United States · Morei v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule, even in criminal cases, is that, if a party has it peculiarly within his power to produce witnesses whose testimony would elucidate the transaction, the fact that he does not do it creates the presumption that the testimony, if produced, would be unfavorable.” 150 U.S. 118 at 121, 14 S.Ct. 40 at 41.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in this particular situation we think the defendant was entitled to have the jury informed as a matter of right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he point of the jury's question was highly relevant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.