Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

257 F.2d 655

Docket No. 14286.

Clark v. Payne

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 28, 1958. Decided June 12, 1958, Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied Sept. 9, 1958.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1958-06-12

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2001

1 district ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on Rogers v. Maron · Evans v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1958-06-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Samuel W. Clark, appellant pro se.

Mr. Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and William W. Pavis, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellees Payne, and others as members of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board for the District of Columbia.

Mr. Morris D. Schwartz, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Philip P. Marenberg and Martin S. Becker, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee Friedman.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, FAHY and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Assuming without deciding that appellant has standing to sue,1 we find no error in the action of the District Court.

¶2

Affirmed.

1

Appellant requested this court to pass on both his standing to sue and on the merits

/257/f2d/655 · .json · Public domain