Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 F.2d 750 - Daugharty v. Gladden

Daugharty v. Gladden’s Empirical Analysis

257 F.2d 750 · 1958

Citation profile

110
cited by 110 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

84 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 110 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Picard v. Connor (1971), Daye v. Attorney General of New York (1982)

84 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

41019581960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Brown v. Allen · Darr v. Burford · Rogers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Ex Parte Hawk No - on Rule to Show Cause and Return

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “book and verse on the federal constitution.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “called attention to his inability to pay for a [transcript].” Id. The petitioner in Daugharty did not provide copious or even thorough facts; he provided just enough facts to apply the constitutional principle&emdash;that dismissing his lawsuit for lack of ability to pay court fees deprived him of the equal protection of the laws. 4 .In the exhaustion context, the Supreme Court has admonished lower courts that the complete exhaustion requirement is not intended to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The cause is remanded to the district court with instructions to enter such orders as may be appropriate to allow Oregon a reasonable time within which to take further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion, failing which appellant shall be discharged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.