Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 F.2d 765 - Banking & Trading Corp. v. Floete

Banking & Trading Corp. v. Floete’s Empirical Analysis

257 F.2d 765 · 1958

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 1993 · most notably Rg Group Inc Rg v. Horn & Hardart Company (1984), Consarc Corporation v. Marine Midland Bank Na (1993)

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

17019581960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co. · Mississippi & Dominion Steamship Co. v. Swift · Smith v. Onyx Oil & Chemical Co. · Upsal Street Realty Co. v. Rubin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * whether the contract is of that class which are usually found to be in writing, whether it is of such a nature as to need a formal writing for its full expression, whether it has few or many details, whether the amount involved is large or small, whether it is a common or unusual contract, whether the negotiations themselves indicate that a written draft is contemplated as the final conclusion of the negotiations. If a written draft is proposed, suggested, or referred to during the negotiations, it is some evidence that the parties intended it to be the final closing of the contract.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.