Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

257 F. App'x 613

Harrison v. Adams

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 11, 2007

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-12-11

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915A

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Decided 2007-12-11

PER CURIAM:

¶1William Henry Harrison appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Adams, No. l:06-cv-00501-TSE (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2007; filed Mar. 19, 2007, entered Mar. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

/257/fappx/613 · .json · Public domain