¶1Corey T. Sneed appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to resubmit his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sneed v. Jackson, No. 5:06-he-02099-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
257 F. App'x 654
Sneed v. Jackson
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided December 10, 2007
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-12-10
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Decided 2007-12-10