Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Griffin v. State (1995), 197 Ga. App. 648 - Zater v. State (1990)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McCannon v. State · 145 Ga. App. 731 - State v. Gilder · Coleman v. State · State v. Gilder · 143 Ga. App. 124 - Perkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the several crimes arising from the same conduct are known to the proper prosecuting officer at the time of commencing the prosecution and are within the jurisdiction of a single court, they must be prosecuted in a single prosecution. . . .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'only to such crimes which are actually known to the prosecuting officer actually handling the proceedings.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the plea and nolle prossed the traffic case. When the felony came on for trial, appellant Powe pled double jeopardy. OCGA § 16-1-7 (b) states that crimes arising from the same conduct that are known to proper prosecuting officers at the time of prosecution, if both are in the jurisdiction of a single court, must be prosecuted in a single prosecution. This Court in Coleman v. State, 256 Ga. 77, 78 ( 343 SE2d 695 ) (1986), held announcement of the sentence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Powe v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.