Holley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 30, 2002

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 2002-08-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2011

1 state decisions

Relies on Alexander v. Guthrie · 197 Ga. App. 34 - Glean v. State · Nudelman v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-08-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Phipps, Judge.

¶1Following a bench trial, Donnell Wayne Holley was convicted of certain misdemeanor traffic offenses. He appeals, contending that the trial court erred in denying his request for a continuance. Holley, however, failed to comply with his obligation of having the misdemeanor trial transcribed or constructing a record of the trial.1 In the absence of a transcript, we are unable to review Holley’s claim that the court erroneously refused to grant him a continuance.2

¶2Judgment affirmed.

Andrews, P. J, and Mikell, J., concur.

¶3Nudelman v. State, 253 Ga. App. 794 (560 SE2d 707) (2002).

¶4 See Alexander v. Guthrie, 216 Ga. App. 460, 461 (1) (454 SE2d 805) (1995); Glean v. State, 197 Ga. App. 34 (3) (397 SE2d 459) (1990).