Ham v. Ham’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 226 Ga. App. 459 - Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp. · Johnson v. Knebel · 66 Ga. App. 142 - Copeland v. State · McArthur v. Morrison · 233 Ga. App. 797 - Carnes v. Woodall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Proof of handwriting may be resorted to in the absence of direct evidence of execution. In such case, any witness who shall swear that he knows or would recognize the handwriting shall be competent to testify as to his belief. The source of his knowledge shall be a question for investigation and shall go entirely to the credit and weight of his evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.