Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 Ind. 562 - Dickerson v. State

Dickerson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

86 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2007 · most notably Duckworth v. Eagan (1989), Ortiz v. State (1976)

86 state decisions

3401972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Coyote v. United States · Jones v. State · Harris v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . The crucial test is whether the words in the context used, considering the age, background, and intelligence of the individual being interrogated, impart a clear, understandable warning of all of his rights.” Coyote v. United States (1967 C.A. 10th Cir.) 380 F.2d 305, 308 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[A]n interrogation, initiated by the police and conducted in the compelling atmosphere of the interrogation room at the police station, at a time the investigation had focused on the accused, constitutes circumstances which would indicate a significant deprivation of freedom so as to require the interrogating officers to advise the suspect of his constitutional rights.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[appellant should not have been instructed to sign the form if he understood it, but rather should have been informed that he would be signing a waiver of his rights and that he should sign it only if he desired to answer questions at that time without the presence or advice of an attorney.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.