Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 KAN 228 - State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2024

24 state decisions

1401995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dunn · State v. Massey · State v. Thomas · State v. Holley · State v. Bradley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The appellate standard for reviewing a trial court’s order under K.S.A. 22-3501(1) on a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence is abuse of discretion, regardless of whether a full hearing with live testimony is held. Under the' abuse of discretion standard, if a reasonable person could agree with the trial court’s decision it will not be disturbed on appeal.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The court on motion of a defendant may grant a new trial to him if required in the interest of justice. ... A motion for a new trial based on the ground of newly discovered evidence may be made within two years after final judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that there is a reasonable probability it would produce a different result upon retrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.