State v. Gulledge’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 district · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Bryant v. State (1996), Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of Tennessee (2009)
2 district · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Brown v. Ohio · Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch · A. Magnano Co. v. Hamilton · Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Ass'n v. Austin Products Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“flourishing underground economy not operate on a tax-free basis.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Martin · Simpson v. Bouker““In State v. Cady, 254 Kan. 393 , 867 P.2d 270 (1994), we described the effect and application of the Double Jeopardy Clause as follows: ‘The Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution protects against (1) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal, (2) a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction, and (3) multiple punishments for the same offense. Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 , 53 L. Ed. 2d 187 , 97 S. Ct. 2221 (1977). The language of § 10 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights is veiy similar to the language contained in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Both provide in effect that no person shall be twice placed in jeopardy for the same offense. The language of the Fifth Amendment guarantees no greater protection to an accused than does § 10 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights. Therefore, the underlying protection contained in the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution is contained in § 10 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights.’ 254 Kan. at 396-97 .” (Emphasis added.) 257 Kan. at 920 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jensen“As a general matter, the unlawfulness of an activity does not prevent its taxation. Montana no doubt could collect its tax on the possession of marijuana , for example, if it had not previously punished the taxpayer for the same offense, or, indeed, if it had assessed the tax in the same proceeding that resulted in his conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.