Middleton v. Frances’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Paintsville Hospital Co. v. Rose (1985), Sanchez v. Medicorp Health System (2005)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Denker Transfer Co. v. Pugh · Reid-Murdock & Co. v. Model Meat & Grocery Co. · Lieb & Son v. Craddock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An apparent or ostensible agent is one whom the principal, either intentionally or by want of ordinary care, induces third persons to believe to be his agent, although he has not, either expressly or by implication, conferred authority upon him.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.