Hiscock v. Hiscock’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 1981
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Amy v. Dubuque · O'Neal v. Rutt · Michigan Insurance v. Brown · President of Grafton Bank v. Doe · May v. Ball
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The indorsements made on the mortgage are properly admissible in evidence (Judson v. Pratt, 208 Mich. 286 ), although, in the absence of other testimony, they are not sufficient to overcome the statutory bar (Michigan Insurance Co. of Detroit v. Brown, 11 Mich. 265 ). The evidence as a whole should be clear and decisive of payment. Cowie v. Fisher, 45 Mich. 629 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McDuffee v. Barker““No suit or proceeding shall be maintained to foreclose a mortgage on real estate, either at law or in equity, unless commenced within fifteen years from and after such mortgage shall be due and payable, or within fifteen years after the last payment was made on said mortgage.” 3 Comp. Laws 1929. § 13975.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McDuffee v. Barker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.