Behr v. Baker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1931

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1931-12-18

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1931-12-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2007

7 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

RETAXATION OF COSTS. I think the rule (Court Rule No. 5, § 7) is valid under which the premium paid for the stay bond was taxed. General rule making power is conferred upon this court by the Constitution (article 7, § 5); and, further, by legislative enactment "the *489 regulation of costs" by rule is specifically left with the court. 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13540.

¶2The amount of the taxable costs will remain as determined by the clerk.

¶3CLARK, C.J., and McDONALD, POTTER, SHARPE, FEAD, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred with NORTH, J.