State v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2017
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Suess · State v. Sweeney · People v. Singer · State v. Wilson · State v. Griggs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Every person who shall wilfully, with intent to defraud by color or aid of a check, draft, or order for the payment of money or the delivery of property, when such person knows that the drawer or maker thereof is not entitled to draw on the drawee for the sum specified therein, or to order the payment of the amount or delivery of the property, although no express representation is made in reference thereto, shall obtain from another any money or property, shall be guilty of stealing the same, and punished accordingly.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if a person has no account with the drawee bank, it necessarily follows that he lacks `sufficient funds in or credit with such bank' as provided for in § 622.04 [fraudulent check statute]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. O'NEAL v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.