Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 N.C. 130 - Taylor v. Taylor

Taylor v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
9
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently April 2008 · most notably Eubanks v. Eubanks (1968), Tidwell v. Booker (1976)

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 34 state decisions

20019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schindler v. Royal Insurance Co. · Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. Heller · Reid v. Holden · Leary v. . Land Bank · Queen City Coach Company v. Burrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Technically, the parties in the criminal prosecution were different. Even so, the issue was identical, and the plaintiff, in the criminal action, had his day in court with reference to such issue. Compare Crosland-Cullen. Co. v. Crosland, 249 N.C. 167 , 105 S.E. 2d 655 , and cases cited. While the conduct for which plaintiff was convicted constitutes an .offense against society, such conduct was made criminal to afford protection to the wilfully abandoned wife. In such criminal prosecution, the wife, although not technically a party, is the person upon whose testimony the State, in large measure, must rely; and the criminal prosecution is based on and arises from the rights and obligations subsisting between the prosecutrix (wife) and the defendant (husband).” Id. at 135.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.