257 N.C. App. 24 - Lasecki v. Lasecki’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Koufman v. Koufman · Stanback v. Stanback · Tennessee-Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp. · Williams v. Williams · D & W, INC. v. City of Charlotte
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The sole function of the equitable remedy of specific performance is to compel a party to do that which in good conscience he ought to do without court compulsion. The remedy rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and is conclusive on appeal absent a showing of a palpable abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the equitable remedy of specific performance may be ordered only if no adequate remedy exists at law, and the party who is ordered to specifically perform is capable of doing so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.