State v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district · 56 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably State v. Bjorklund (2000), State v. Trotter (2000)
2 district · 56 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Arizona v. Fulminante · Neder v. United States · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Tumey v. State of Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After a first motion for post conviction relief has been judicially determined, any subsequent motion for post conviction relief from the same conviction and sentence may be dismissed by the district court, unless the motion affirmatively shows on its face that the basis relied upon for relief was not available at the time of filing a prior motion for post conviction relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Parmar“Ryan cannot raise the issues that counsel litigated on direct appeal concerning the impact of Judge Finn’s turning his back during Ryan’s testimony simply by rephrasing this as being cumulative judicial misconduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Allowing Ryan to first raise the issue of competency after more than ten years of appellate litigation, during which Ryan chose not to raise the issue would make a mockery of the finality of the judicial process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ryan v. Clarke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.