257 N.J. Super. 347 - Aronowitz v. Planning Bd.’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2011
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT. · Hills Dev. Co. v. Bernards Tp. in Somerset Cty. · Donadio v. Cunningham · Riggs v. Township of Long Beach · KRUVANT BROS. v. Mayor & Council, Tp. of Cedar Grove
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he appearance of impropriety `must be something more than a fanciful possibility.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The planning board shall grant an extension of final [major site plan or subdivision] approval for a period determined by the board but not exceeding one year from what would otherwise be the expiration date, if the developer proves to the reasonable satisfaction of the board that the developer was barred or prevented, directly or indirectly, from proceeding with the development because of delays in obtaining legally required approvals from other governmental entities and that the developer applied promptly for and diligently pursued these approvals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While the purpose of the act is to secure public access to the meetings of public bodies, N.J.S.A. 10:4-15 `provide[s] a means to balance the rights of an informed citizenry against the need of government to function effectively.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.