257 Pa. Super. 535 - Commonwealth v. Antonuccio’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

52 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[m]ere assertions of due diligence and unproven facts, do not establish cause for an extension under Rule 1100(c).”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 290 Pa. Super. 510 - Commonwealth v. Delpiano · 292 Pa. Super. 137 - Commonwealth v. Carr

2. “Antonuccio also stated: Under Commonwealth v. Mayfield, 469 Pa. 214 , 364 A.2d 1345 (1976), the trial court may grant an extension under Rule 1100(c) only upon a record showing of: (1) The”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 292 Pa. Super. 137 - Commonwealth v. Carr · 344 Pa. Super. 470 - Commonwealth v. Hadfield

3. ““We believe that these form petitions not only frustrate the intent of Rule 1100, but also denigrate the procedures prescribed therein. We have seen no petition of this form type which attempts to establish the exercise of due diligence by the Commonwealth beyond the recitation of the words themselves. As such, they are defective.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 275 Pa. Super. 513 - Commonwealth v. Akridge