¶2It having been determined by the Circuit Court, after an evidentiary hearing conforming with the judgment of this Court heretofore filed (253 S. C. 513, 171 S. E. (2d) 699), that the appellant, Pearson, after receiving the benefit of the procedural safeguards required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. (2d) 694, with respect to the evidence admitted against him, voluntarily and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination, said appellant’s conviction is, therefore, affirmed.
257 S.C. 68
State v. Curley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided October 20, 1971
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1971-10-20
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Curley
Decided 1971-10-20