Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 SO2D 538 - Rainey v. Nelson

Rainey v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1984
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Larson v. Lesser · Pacheco v. Pacheco · 86 So. 2d 438 - Eelbeck Milling Company v. Mayo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “agricultural land or land used exclusively for non-commercial recreational purposes may be classified by general law and assessed solely on the basis of character or use.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... there is no deprivation of a property right in denying special tax treatment to this property owner since there is no "right" to the special treatment in the first instance. The only potential constitutional question here involves an equal protection issue, which can only be satisfied upon the showing of a valid exercise of the state's police power.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.