Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 So. 2d 92 - State v. McCurdy

257 So. 2d 92 - State v. McCurdy’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hattaway v. United States · Fitch v. State · Harrell v. State · Bargesser v. State · McDowell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"However, we see nothing inconsistent between the two statutes. Both relate to forgery and both encompass forgery of a credit card. The mere fact that the general forgery statute embraced in Ch. 831 is broader than the credit card statute embraced in Ch. 817 is no reason for denying a clear field of operation to either, at the election of the State."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.