257 So. 3d 477 - Gray v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[b]ond cannot be denied at first appearance, without the first appearance court making the necessary findings pursuant to article I, section 14 of the Florida Constitution and [ Arthur ].”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Thourtman v. Junior · Thourtman v. Junior

2. “to hold the defendant without bond pending an Arthur hearing ... the first appearance judge [i]s 'required to find that the probable cause affidavit (or other materials before the court) establishe[s] that proof of guilt [i]s evident or the presumption [i]s great' "; and (2) "if the first appearance court finds that this standard has been met and declines to set bond, the defendant can later move to set bond and request a full Arthur hearing, where the defendant has a right to present evidence and to ask the court to exercise its discretion to set bond.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Thourtman v. Junior

3. “that the refusal to set bond or make the required findings violates [A]rticle I, section 14 of the Florida Constitution.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Thourtman v. Junior