Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 S.W.3d 698 - In Re Chambless

In Re Chambless’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth))

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Stanley v. Illinois · Troxel v. Granville · In the Interest of M.S. · Wiley v. Spratlan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “overcome[] the presumption that a parent acts in the best interest of the ... child by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that denial of possession of or access ... would significantly impair the child's physical health or emotional well-being.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re MTC
  2. “so long as a parent adequately cares for his or her children (i.e., is fit), there will normally be no reason for the State to inject itself into the private realm of the family.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re BGD
  3. “[p]ossession of or access to a child by a grandparent is governed by the standards established by Chapter 153 [of the Texas Family Code].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re MTC

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.