Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 Va. 216 - Payne v. Commonwealth

Payne v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Powell v. Commonwealth (2004), Coleman v. Commonwealth (2001)

2 federal appellate · 57 state decisions

400199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Brown v. Ohio · Whalen v. United States · Illinois v. Vitale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This constitutional provision guarantees protection against (1) a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal; (2) a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction; and (3) multiple punishments for the same offense.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In the single-trial setting, 'the role of the constitutional guarantee is limited to assuring that the court does not exceed its legislative authorization by imposing multiple punishments for the same offense.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.