Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 257 WIS 323 - Oshogay v. Schultz

Oshogay v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
June 1975
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hein v. Mildebrandt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . we are convinced that he [defendant] was guilty of negligence as a matter of law and should have been so found. Certainly, one is guilty of negligence as a matter of law who fires a revolver with as little effort to control the course of the bullet as defendant . . . exercised .... [Defendant’s] act under the circumstances indicates a recklessness and a disregard for the safety and security of his patrons. . , . He did not, it is true, intend to shoot the plaintiff, but he did intend to fire the gun; the sole question was whether such act constituted negligence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.