Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 Ala. 319 - Ex Parte Smith

Ex Parte Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
February 1982
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1982

14 state decisions

801953196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. Cahela · Hendley v. Chabert · Prudential Casualty Co. v. Kerr · Dunklin v. Wilson · Independent Publishing Co. v. American Press Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A well settled principle is that the court in which a judgment by default was rendered has the duty (not a discretion) to set aside that judgment on motion made within the thirty-day period when it is proven to the satisfaction of the court that service was not had on the defendant, even though the record shows that service was had, and it must be shown on the further hearing of that motion that he had a good and meritorious defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"* * * [W]hen a motion is made within the thirty-day period, and it is satisfactorily proven that service was not had as shown by the return, the court does not have jurisdiction to render a judgment by default, although he may have had some personal knowledge of its existence. * * C.J.S., Courts, § 83, pp. 123, 124; 42 Am.Jur. 8, notes 18, 19 and 20; * * *."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““When those matters (i. e. compliance with the service provisions) appear of record in the cause they show on the face of the proceeding a sufficient service on the defendant to support a personal judgment against him as if personally served within the State.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.