Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 Ala. 427 - Hooks v. Hooks

Hooks v. Hooks’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2007

20 state decisions

110195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. McNutt · Lehman v. Lewis · Corley v. Vizard · Tilford v. Torrey & Lockwood · J. A. Owens & Co. v. Blanks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A resulting trust, the holding- of title by one with beneficial ownership in another, is a creature of equity, based upon the prima facie presumption that he who pays the whole or an aliquot part of the purchase price for lands becomes the beneficial owner. The doctrine does not rest on an express, but on an implied, agreement, by which the title is taken in the name of another as matter of convenience. No tort or breach of duty is involved in this form of trust. The conveyance, as made, may be in keeping with the common purpose of all parties.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.