Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 Ark. 880 - Parker v. State

Parker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019 · most notably Cary v. State (1976), Shelton v. State (1985)

8 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

16019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Caton v. State · Johnson v. State · Routt v. State · Higgins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he mere snatching of money or goods from the hand of another is not robbery, unless some injury is done to the person or there be some struggle for possession of the property prior to the actual taking or some force used in order to take it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A previous conviction or finding of guilt of a felony may be proved by any evidence that satisfies the trial court beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was convicted or found guilty. The following are sufficient to support a finding of a prior conviction or finding of guilt: (1) a duly certified copy of the record of a previous conviction or finding of guilt by a court of record; or. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.