Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 CONN 153 - State v. Burton

State v. Burton’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
2
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

2 district · 114 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably State v. Singh (2002), State v. Thompson (2003)

2 district · 114 state decisions

1030200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. California · State v. Golding · Griffin v. United States · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The void for vagueness doctrine is a procedural due process concept that originally was derived from the guarantees of due process contained in the fifth and fourteenth amendments to the United States constitution. . . . The constitutional injunction that is commonly referred to as the void for vagueness doctrine embodies two central precepts: the right to fair warning of the effect of a governing statute or regulation and the guarantee against standard less law enforcement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““(b) Unless the accused requests otherwise, the court, shall instruct the jury that they may draw no unfavorable inferences from the accused’s failure to testify. In cases tried to the court, no unfavorable inferences shall be drawn by the court from the accused’s silence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If the meaning of a statute can be fairly ascertained a statute will not be void for vagueness since [m]any statutes will have some inherent vagueness, for [i]n most English words and phrases there lurk uncertainties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.